Speed dating hatfield
For example, cultures differ in how critical attractiveness is in mate selection. Are they worried that the confederate may be peculiar, dangerous, or making fun of them? Do cultural and historical factors shape men and willingness to engage in casual sex?The reason for this difference is that cultural preferences are mediated by parasite prevalence (how deadly various parasites are in a culture): People from cultures with high parasite prevalence are more likely to value attractiveness in a mate than are people from cultures with low parasite prevalence (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000). How many people have they approached before the participant? Why haven’t social and evolutionary psychologists conducted more research of this kind?They approached fellow college students of another gender and asked one of three questions: (a) “Would you go out with me tonight? Yet, when confederates asked, “Would you come over to my apartment” or “Would you go to bed with me? In the following series of experiments we attempted to develop a pencil and paper method to mirror the procedure of the classic study. Although cultural and social considerations may have influenced participants’ tendency to accept or reject sexual offers, as predicted by evolutionary perspectives, in all three experiments men were more likely than women to accept sexual offers. *Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822.” (b) “Would you come over to my apartment tonight? ” Men and women differed markedly in their receptivity to casual sexual offers. The studies also explored some of the reasons men and women gave for refusing a date, apartment visit, or a sexual encounter. E-mail: [email protected] is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Some examples: In 2003, Psychological Inquiry designated the study “a classic, an experiment that scholars will still be talking about 100 years from now.” For evolutionary psychologists, it has become part of the “canon” (see, for example, Buss, 2003), documenting the importance of gender in love and casual sexual relationships.Several TV science programs in America, Austria, Canada, and Germany, among others, have discussed the study and have attempted to conduct partial or full replications/variations of the original experiment (Hatfield, 2006; Molzer, 2003; Voracek, Hofhansl, & Fisher, 2005).
Since its publication, this study has attracted a great deal of attention.
Among the most cited series of experiments in social and evolutionary psychology are those conducted by Clark and Hatfield (1989, 2003).
In these studies, college students served as confederates in a simple field experiment.
Specifically, we expect to secure a main effect for participants’ Gender.
This was, of course, the main (and most important) finding in the classic study.
” of this phenomenon—for example, to begin to investigate: 1. Social psychologists might, for example, ask how old are the confederates? We were hoping to replicate/extend using paper and pencil methods the main results of the classic study, thus demonstrating that we had crafted a prototype.